The scholarship of dedicated letterers was matched only by the
ingenuity with which they approached their craft. Experimentation with
tools and techniques was
de rigueur for the trade. For brush lettering
artists, the dependable Winsor & Newton Series 7 was the principle
workhorse in the professional’s creative arsenal. Despite its prized
status, and considerable cost, professionals occasionally barbered or
mitered the brush, carefully coiffing the tip in order to provide a
particular effect. James Wood customized the albata handle of his
favorite, notching it with “finger positions like a six-shooter.” Other
trusty standbys included Osmiroid, Gillott and Speedball brand pens,
the nibs of the latter often cunningly reshaped. Worn out and retired
ruling pens gained new life after being filed down and cleverly
customized to create varieties of unexpected letterforms. While
Benguiat utilized this method for Suzie-Q and a handful of his
Photo-Lettering alphabets, he credits the multi-talented Morris
Glickman with originating the idea. Ray Cruz learned similar tricks
from his years working with John Schaedler and Larry Ottino: “Larry
used all kinds of materials for writing, even Popsicle sticks. Unusual
tools have different types of restrictions that force you to work in new
ways.” It was this unorthodox approach that gave a distinctive flavor
to scores of lively headlines and logos.
Though no typeface has yet to match the uniqueness of hand-lettering, Underware’s Liza typeface attempts to capture some of the idiosyncrasies that make brush script one-of-a-kind.“Finished
lettering”—reproduction-ready as opposed to preparatory comprehensive
lettering—was generally executed in one of two ways. Built-up lettering was meticulously drawn, while the knocked-out variety
was written with a pen, brush or other tool. The real secret of free
scripts is that they only appeared to be dashed off spontaneously;
actually, both methods usually required extensive editing. Knock-out
lettering was routinely created by piecing together the most successful
and attractive letterforms from various takes. It could take dozens of
write-outs to arrive at a finished piece of lettering. In some cases,
significantly reworked script lettering demanded more time and
attention to produce than a comparable job lettered in another, more
conventional letter.

Left: Car emblems echoed the informal lettering fashions of the day, while attempting to express the essence of the automobile, be it leisure, speed or style. Right: Although influenced by mid-century brush script lettering, Martijn Rijven’s vector wordmark exhibits an unmistakably modern feel. Despite the enthusiasm and resourcefulness
of lettering artists in their pursuit of mastery over the casual
script, the 1960s saw an apparent downturn in its use. The ensuing
International Typographic Style, which emphasized restraint and
uncompromising simplicity, appealed to the changing sensibilities of
graphic designers. In 1969, David Gates assessed the situation this
way: “...brush lettering either ‘says it’ exquisitely right or terribly
wrong. Perhaps for this reason art directors and designers tend to
avoid brush lettering. They can see how a typeface ‘speaks’ in their
type specimen book, but they cannot be sure about a brush lettering
caption that is yet to be produced.” Ruth Guzik, a gifted finished
letterer who worked alongside Gates in Julian Mansfield's studio,
attributes the decline to the changing currents of fashion: “By the
time I started working for Julian in 1953, that trend had already
started to fade; there wasn’t as much of a demand for it anymore. It’s
like everything else. Things move in cycles—they die out, and then
they’re back again.”
The 1955 Photo-Lettering Inc. catalog featured popular brush script styles from leading professionals like Ed Benguiat and Tony Stan. Though casual script letters never left main-stream graphic design consciousness, appreciation for them has
seen a welcome increase over the past years. Veteran letterer Doyald
Young, a former student of Mortimer Leach, continues to create
meticulously sculpted work, drawing on centuries-old historical forms
as well as from more recent models. Consistently pushing the envelope,
avant-garde typeface designers Underware add a unique perspective to
the field; their inventive, yet disciplined brush-inspired typefaces,
demonstrate a resourcefulness evocative of Roger Excoffon's
unprecedented Mistral. Drawing on his experience behind a brush,
Charles Borges offers a sign painter’s approach to casual script fonts.
Within contemporary art, Evan Hecox’s cut paper-like lettering conjures
up images of Stuart Davis’s iconic canvases, while the artist’s washy
brush lettering looks like a modern-day script complement to Pete Dom’s
ad work for Swans Down flour nearly 70 years ago. A stroll down New
York City’s Canal Street is enough to remind anyone how provocative and
memorable Stephen Sprouse’s energetic brush-lettered patterns for Louis
Vuitton truly are. If nothing else, history has demonstrated the
staying power of the casual script. Yet, even though experts make it
look all too easy, typographic theorist Maximilien Vox reminds us, “Easy, yes, like playing the violin.” CA