Editor’s Column

Considering the current state of the economy, we were surprised to receive 5,470 entries to this year’s Illustration Annual, an eleven percent jump over last year. One partial explanation was the launch of our online entry system that allows for the direct uploading of digital files. Consequently, 90 percent of this year’s entries were submitted digitally.

Go to Jurors Biographies

“I was encouraged to see the volume of entries that were submitted,” said juror Devin Pedzwater. “It was good to see work from artists new to me.”

“There was some great classic work balanced by some new, inventive, fresh styles,” said juror Bob Barrie. “Both ends of the spectrum presented some really nice conceptual work, as well as some fine representational illustration.”

“The caliber of the entries was higher than I had expected,” added juror Karen Powers. “In the final round, almost every piece demonstrated, at the least, an impressive level of technical competence.”

When asked what they saw, several jurors cited recognizable trends. “Across the board, many pieces employed some form of abstraction and/or distortion, or strange surreal creatures and scenarios in eerie Dali-esque landscapes,” said juror Nanette Biers.

“We saw reams of rabbits, cows, squids, octopi, skulls, hearts and distantly-spaced eyes, but even those offered some stunning executions,” Barrie said.

“What we didn’t see was the dimensionless vector illustration that was ubiquitous a few years ago,” Powers said. “Many illustrators who work digitally are using interesting combinations of traditional art and digital compositing and manipulation to give their work depth and textural richness.”

“There were so many interesting, well-executed, and effective images. From my own experience, I know the time, effort, vision and skill it can take to make a great piece, and it was difficult to say no to so many worthy contestants.” —Nanette Biers

What did they see that was new? “Those extraordinary United Airlines commercials took my breath away every time,” Biers said. “They were animated poems.” “I hope that the use of animated illustration will continue to grow since it is such a welcome departure in broadcast advertising,” juror Chris Rovillo added.

“Information graphics was a surprising theme,” Pedzwater said. “I’ve seen that trend gain popularity in the editorial category, but it was interesting to see it appear in the advertising and for sale categories as well.”

When asked about the future, Powers described a multifaceted career. “A few of the illustrators I work with make considerably more income from selling their work through art galleries and shows than they do from book illustration earnings,” she said. “One of the most enterprising illustrators I know has explored a whole range of outlets from wall murals for restaurants to stuffed toys, customized MINI Coopers and sold-out exhibitions of her erotic drawings. She’s also self-published two books and sold over 150,000 copies. She knows how to hustle!”

“As technology advances, there will surely be many surprises, but there’s always room for retro,” Biers said. “Older, more traditional methods of illustration may seem new and fresh to each successive generation raised on screens.”

“I had expected to see more manipulated photo/illustration with lots of overwrought digital wizardry and was pleased to see that was not the case. So much of the work still involved traditional illustration techniques based on strong drawing skills.” —Karen Powers

This year’s jurying began on Sunday morning, March 29th, in two large conference halls, each equipped with projectors for digital entries and six rows of tables for tear sheets and proofs.

The jurors worked in two groups of three with Jean Coyne acting as the sixth judge during the screening. All categories had been divided so each team screened half of the entries submitted. The judges alternated between viewing a session of projected digital files and then a set-up of print entries. Any juror could place an illustration in the finals by handing a printed piece to a member of our staff. Digital files were screened by checking the “in” or “out” column on prepared scoring sheets.

The final voting took place on Monday with all five jurors working together. Print entries were again spread out on the tables. Two paper cups, one white for “in,” the other red for “out,” with slots cut in the bottom, were placed upside down to the right of the pieces. The jurors voted by putting a different colored tile into the bottom of the appropriate cup. The different colored tiles allowed us to make sure that every entry was voted on by every judge. Finalists submitted as digital files were again voted on by each juror checking “in” or “out” on scoring sheets. Four votes were required for acceptance.

Judges were not permitted to vote on projects they were directly involved in creating. When a judge’s piece was in the finals, either Jean or I would cast the fifth vote.

I would like to thank each of the judges for their conscientious efforts in selecting our 50th Annual Exhibition. —Patrick Coyne ca

Jurors Biographies

landing-image

Bob Barrie

Partner/Executive Creative Director

Barrie D’Rozario Murphy

Bob Barrie is partner and executive creative director of Barrie D’Rozario Murphy advertising agency in Minneapolis, Minnesota. In 2007, Barrie founded the agency with partners Stuart D’Rozario, who was a CD at Fallon, and David Murphy, then president of Saatchi & Saatchi/LA. Prior to BD’M, Barrie joined Fallon in 1983. There he was an art director and partner. Barrie has won awards from Communication Arts, Cannes, Clio, The New York Art Director’s Club and The One Show. Barrie has given talks on the topic of advertis­ing in locations as diverse as Stockholm, Singapore and Milwaukee. He has also judged dozens of advertising shows, from Hong Kong to Cannes.

landing-image

Nanette Biers

Illustrator

Freelance

Nanette Biers has been a professional freelance illustrator for the past 29 years, after graduating with honors from UC Berkeley with a degree in fine art. Her work has been selected for inclusion in several annual exhibitions of the New York Society of Illustrators and Communication Arts, and her career was profiled in the January/February 2001 issue of CA. Clients have included Sony, IBM, Dupont, American Express, Bristol Myers, John Deere Credit, Northwest Airlines, APL Shipping Lines and Celestial Seasonings. Samples of her work can be viewed at www.nanettebiers.com and www.morgangaynin.com.

landing-image

Devin Pedzwater

Design Director

SPIN magazine

Devin Pedzwater has been instrumental in honing the look of four of the most iconic magazines in contemporary history: SPIN, Rolling Stone, Sports Illustrated and Condé Nast Traveler. As the design director of New York-based SPIN, he oversees the design, photography, illustration and typography of the magazine and all of the company’s digital properties. Pedzwater received a BA from The Pennsylvania State University, where he was recently honored with a Distinguished Alumni award. His work has been recognized by such groups as American Illustration, American Photography, Communication Arts, Print and the Society of Publication Designers.

landing-image

Karen Powers

Art Director/Designer

Kids Can Press

Karen Powers has been designing books for young people for fifteen years at Kids Can Press, a children’s book publisher in Toronto, Canada. She graduated with a BFA from York University where she concentrated on printmaking and painting and pursued further studies in design at the Art Institute in Chicago and the University of Illinois. She has art directed and designed many award-winning books, including the critically acclaimed Visions In Poetry series and the popular Scaredy Squirrel series and has been the recipient of numerous Alcuin Awards for Excellence in Book Design in Canada.

landing-image

Chris Rovillo

President/Creative Director

Rovillo+Reitmayer

Chris Rovillo is president, creative director of Dallas, Texas-based Rovillo+Reitmayer. Rovillo graduated from North Texas State University in 1973 and began his career in the Neiman Marcus advertising department as an art director. He joined Richards, Brock, Miller, Mitchell and Associates as a graphic designer upon formation of the firm in 1978 and became a principal in 1983. In 1990 he left to form his own company, Rovillo Design Associates. In 2004, the company evolved to Rovillo+Reitmayer with the promotion of Samantha Reitmayer as principal and creative director. Rovillo’s work has been recognized by major national and international creative organizations.

Create an Account
Subscribe
Sign In

Subscribe
Sign In