Editor’s Column

This year’s Illustration competition received a slight bump in entries, mostly due to a significant increase in student participation. And, although the editorial category registered a notable decline in entries, the number of editorial projects selected for inclusion in this year’s Annual exceeded the last several years.

Go to Jurors Biographies

“I was impressed with just how many great pieces had been entered,” says juror Ryan Anderson. “We saw everything from the completely abstract to very tight realism. Agencies, companies and publications are once again coming to appreciate the nuances of emotion that only illustration can provide.”

“There were tons of entries to choose from—especially from new talent,” says juror Carolyn Perot. “It was fantastic to see brilliant work from both the old guard and new and unknown illustrators. I was surprised and excited to see some established illustrators totally reinvent themselves.”

“The biggest surprise was the large amount of illustrators I’d never seen before,” juror Chris Buzelli says. “It was a refreshing surprise, especially after my experience judging other illustration competitions.” 

“Maybe what’s old is new, but there were a lot of classically rendered pieces,” juror Lesley Palmer says. “I didn’t see as many vectors or bold poppy colors as I thought I would, given current trends.”

“I’m heartened to see that illustration is coming back to hand-drawn and painted styles and moving away from hard-edged computer or photo-realistic styles,” says Perot. “But contentwise, illustration is more heavy hitting, brash and irreverent than ever.” 

“The ability of illustrators to communicate quickly, clearly and shockingly in one strong—often politically motivated—image was evident and on display in the entries,” juror Kristen Nobles says.

Speaking of politics: “Another surprise was the large amount of Trump illustrations,” Buzelli says. “Illustrators are having an important visual impact on our current political environment, and I can only imagine that number increasing for next year’s competition.”

Though jurors had much to like among the submissions, they found several areas lacking.

“Coming from the world of children’s book art and young adult fiction covers, I was disappointed that not many entries were from my flourishing, diverse field,” Nobles says.

“My biggest disappointment was the lack of quality animation in the competition,” says Anderson. “Maybe animators and illustrators don’t really think of animation when it comes to the Illustration Annual.” 

Several judges also provided advice for those illustrators whose entries were not accepted.

“There was a very fine line between some of the pieces that made it into the Annual and some that did not,” says Anderson. “Generally, the pieces that made it had something that pushed the work to another level. It wasn’t enough to be proficient—the work needed to tell a compelling story.”“There were certain styles that dominated the new illustrators’ work that didn’t make it to the final round,” Perot says. “Art directors still favor punchy, conceptual work over complex work that doesn’t have a clear, simple message.” 

“While many images were strong in their statements, they also seemed a bit one note and lacked a broad spectrum of emotions,” Nobles says.

“It’s important for artists to remember to steer clear of visual clichés—bird cages to represent entrapment is one example,” says Palmer.

When the judges were asked to suggest other profit centers that illustrators could pursue, one direction dominated their responses.

“Lots of publishers want animated GIFs and video content,” Perot says. “I hope illustrators can find ways to make these clever and simple—not merely distracting. If animation adds to the story or tells one of its own and entertains at the same time, I’m all for it.”

Palmer agrees. “More and more companies are looking for short video opportunities, particularly for social media.”

“Technology has opened up new career possibilities for illustrators,” Buzelli says. “It is up to us to keep pushing for healthier budgets and educating for fair contracts so that more can enjoy working in this industry.” 

A minimum of three out of five votes was required for a project to be awarded in this year’s competition. I would like to extend our grateful appreciation to our jurors for their conscientious efforts in selecting our 58th Illustration Annual. —Patrick Coyne, ca

Jurors Biographies

landing-image

Ryan Anderson

partner and creative director

Fluid Advertising

Ryan Anderson is a partner and creative director at Fluid Advertising in Bountiful, Utah. He has received awards from most of the advertising industry’s top shows, and collaborating with talented illustrators has been one of the highlights of his career. His lifelong love of art escalated when he had the opportunity to live in Italy and experience the birthplace of the Renaissance firsthand. He also loves the outdoors and has a bucket list that includes visiting as many national parks as possible. His job has rubbed off on his wife and four children, who have become very astute at recognizing good kerning.

landing-image

Chris Buzelli

illustrator

Chris Buzelli was born south of Chicago and grew up oil painting in his grandfather’s television repair shop. After graduating from Rhode Island School of Design (RISD), Buzelli moved to New York City and began his journey as an illustrator. His work has appeared in many publications, on book covers, and in projects for design firms and ad agencies, and his oil paintings can be viewed in various galleries throughout the United States. He has been awarded Gold and Silver medals from the Society of Illustrators and Spectrum. Buzelli paints in his East Village studio, teaches at RISD and the School of Visual Arts, and lives with his wife, SooJin.

landing-image

Kristen Nobles

founding publisher

Page Street Publishing

Kristen Nobles is founding publisher of the children’s division of Page Street Publishing, located near Boston. She spent thirteen years prior as an art director at Candlewick Press and was a senior designer at Chronicle Books in San Francisco. Nobles graduated from the State University of New York at Buffalo with degrees in communication design and art history and has completed further studies at Harvard University, the Massachusetts College of Art and Design, and the School of Visual Arts. Nobles’s passion for children’s books was passed down from her mother, an elementary teacher, and her grandmother, a librarian.

landing-image

Lesley Q. Palmer

art director

AARP Media

Lesley Q. Palmer, the art director at AARP Media in Washington, DC, works on creative for AARP The Magazine, the AARP Bulletin and digital editions of both. After starting her magazine design career in New York at Hearst, love took her to the DC area, where she has spent the past nine years as art director for AARP’s publications, designing editorial layouts, logos and book jackets. Industry recognition of her team’s work includes nods from Communications Arts, Folio and min. When Palmer’s not pushing pixels, she’s chasing around two little humans at her home in Virginia.

landing-image

Carolyn Perot

art director

Mother Jones

Carolyn Perot has been the art director at Mother Jones since 2008. She has been designing pages and assigning illustrations since 1992, having worked at magazines covering technology, business, lifestyle, dogs and politics. She holds undergraduate degrees from California College of the Arts and Stanford University. Her work has been recognized by the Society of Publication Designers (SPD), and illustrations she has commissioned have appeared in American Illustration, Communication Arts and SPD. In 2017, Mother Jones won the Magazine of the Year award from the American Society of Magazine Editors.

Create an Account
Subscribe
Sign In

Subscribe
Sign In