Loading ...

Editor’s Column

The number of submissions we received for this year’s Illustration Annual—4,362—was slightly lower than the previous year. We registered gains most notably in the Animation, Institutional and Books categories, and the greatest declines were in Unpublished, followed by Editorial. While no competition can include every piece of illustration produced in the last year, the jury was generally pleased with the variety of submissions.
Go to Jurors Biographies

“From digital, to pen-and-ink, to collage, to oil-on-canvas—there was a pleasant variety of numerous styles and techniques,” said juror Craig Mikes.

“Surprisingly, there was less digital work than I was expecting. I thought the influx of digital drawing pads, pressure-sensitive pens and an array of applications would have a bigger impact on the work. The artists’ hands are still proving to be the best tools with which to create.”

“The hand-drawn, straightforward illustration style continues to be favored over heavily manipulated digital art,” juror Jill Shimabukuro said. “Many of the illustrations were conceptually strong, witty and subtle.”

“It was refreshing to see so much international illustration work submitted and most, if not all of it, was new to me,” juror Aviva Michaelov said. “Since I come from an editorial background, most advertising illustration was new to me as well.”

“The overall quality of submissions was quite good,” juror Janine Vangool said. “One thing that was a bit difficult was to just start judging without having the benefit of a visual scan of all the entries. Perhaps this is why we erred on the generous side when selecting work [in the screening round] to remain in contention.”

Shimabukuro voiced a complaint echoed by juries in the past. “Some of my fellow judges and I were puzzled by the illustrations submitted as part of a series; often I had no choice but to reject the series because of a single, poor-performing image,” she said.

“The winning work I witnessed not only used artful skill but great concepts as well to solve strategic challenges.” —Craig Mikes

Juror Jeffrey Smith expressed disappointment over the absence of reportage and narrative work in this year’s submissions. “I don’t think that the lack of this kind of work is any fault of CA’s. I do think that there is less and less of this kind of work being done in illustration today.”

I asked the jurors for their view on the current state of the industry.

“I find that illustration is going through a new golden age,” Michaelov said. “There are new venues for publishing art, mostly online or in small print runs. Artists, new and old, publish and share more work, and discuss their thought process. A stronger international community of illustrators has developed, which allows for collaborations across cultures.”

“Many of my students seem far more interested in bypassing the traditional road to New York in favor of a small shop in a small town where they hope to sell their original artwork and prints, along with other art-related items such as arts and crafts, and enjoy the personal expression of self-publishing,” Smith said.

“Emerging illustrators who are meeting with some success are being quite entrepreneurial about their careers,” Vangool said. “They sell posters and products, license their designs, have engaging blogs and are active on social media. This multi-channel broadcast of one’s work is the best way to be seen and to nurture new opportunities. As an art director, I appreciate working with illustrators who show this initiative and drive, who aren’t afraid of the business aspect of making art and illustration.”

Smith provided a list of other fields illustrators could explore: “Animated films, video-game art, television animation, motion graphics for advertising, self-publishing, prints of assignments for sale on the Internet, gallery sales, teaching at schools, teaching at animation companies, teaching private workshops, even tattoo art.”

“A competition like CA’s brings together several generations of artists and it’s wonderful to see them side by side—new artists working in retro styles and older artists refreshing their styles.” —Aviva Michaelov

In closing, Mikes expressed optimism for the future of illustration. “As ‘instant’ and ‘retro-technique’ photography continue to overwhelm us on a daily basis in social channels, the true skill of illustrators will only flourish as a way for creative work to stand out.”

This year’s jurors worked in two groups of three, with executive editor Jean Coyne acting as the sixth judge during the screening round. All categories had been divided so each team screened half of the entries submitted. The judges alternated between viewing projected digital files and a setup of print entries in multiple sessions. Any juror could place an illustration in the finals by handing a printed piece to a member of our staff. Digital files were screened by checking the “in” or “out” column on prepared scoring sheets.

All five jurors worked together in the final round. Print entries were again spread out on the tables. Two paper cups, one white for “in,” the other red for “out,” with slots cut in the bottom, were placed upside down to the right of the pieces. The jurors voted by putting a different colored tile into the bottom of the appropriate cup. The different colored tiles allowed us to make sure that every entry was voted on by every judge. Finalists submitted as digital files were again voted on by each juror checking “in” or “out” on scoring sheets. Four “in” votes were required for acceptance.

Judges were not permitted to vote on projects they were directly involved in creating. When a judge’s piece was in the finals, either Jean or I would cast the fifth vote.

I would like to thank each of the judges for their conscientious efforts in selecting our 55th Illustration Annual. —Patrick Coyne ca

Jurors Biographies
Aviva Michaelov
art director
New York Times
Aviva Michaelov grew up in Tel Aviv, Israel, and graduated from Parsons The New School for Design. She is currently art director of the Sunday Review section of the New York Times. While at Parsons, Michaelov worked at multidisciplinary studio pixelpress.org as a print and web designer. After graduating she freelanced for R/GA, and in 2004 she began working at the New York Times as a designer, and later as an art director. Previous work at the Times included art direction of the Week in Review section, several issues of the Year in Pictures section, the Times magazine and the redesign of the Book Review section with Nicholas Blechman.
Craig Mikes
principal/creative director
Proof Advertising
During his 20 years in the business, Craig Mikes has worked at 15 agencies in 7 states, from quirky boutiques to the largest agencies in the world. An art director by trade, he’s also a writer, illustrator, photographer, font creator and commercial director. Mikes has received over 250 individual awards and accolades, including honors from Archive, Cannes, Clios, Communication Arts, the 4A’s O’Tooles, Graphis and The One Club. He also has a TV spot on permanent display at MoMA. After eight years running his own creative boutique, Mikes joined Proof Advertising at its inception in September 2010 as a principal and creative director.
Jill Shimabukuro
director of design
University of Chicago Press
Jill Shimabukuro is an award-winning book designer and director of design at the University of Chicago Press, where, for the past thirteen years, it has been her privilege to build a team of internationally celebrated book designers. Shimabukuro has lectured on book design at universities, conferences and workshops. Her work has been recognized by AIGA 50/50, Association of American University Presses, Communication Arts, Print’s Regional Annual, the Society of Typographic Arts and the Type Directors Club, among others. Most recently, New City named her one of the 50 most influential design professionals in Chicago.
Jeffrey Smith
Jeffrey Smith Illustration
Jeffrey Smith is an American illustrator born in Montebello, California. He studied photography and commercial art at Los Angeles Trade Technical College and illustration at Art Center College of Design. In 1980, Smith moved to New York. Over the next thirteen years, Smith earned a master’s degree from the School of Visual Arts, taught there for eight years and became a nationally known freelance illustrator. Today Smith is a professor at Art Center, where he has taught since 1994. His most recent book assignment was Shadow Knights: The Secret War Against Hitler (Simon & Schuster, 2010).
Janine Vangool
publisher, editor and designer
Janine Vangool is the Calgary, Alberta-based publisher, editor and designer of UPPERCASE, a quarterly magazine for the creative and curious. She has also developed and published many books (ten and counting) under the UPPERCASE name. Vangool worked as a free­lance graphic designer for a dozen years in the arts, culture and publishing sectors and has also taught typography and publication design at the college level.

With a free Commarts account, you can enjoy 50% more free content
Create an Account
Get a subscription and have unlimited access
Already a subscriber or have a Commarts account?
Sign In

Get a subscription and have unlimited access
Already a subscriber?
Sign In